Write a reflection of on a workshop you attend on (the total Quality management).
• Link the workshop to the personal development plan (Quality) the competency you want to improve.
• Add 8 References (Kindly, include a screenshots of the References or links).
• Using Harvard Style.
• Please, refer to the attached documents (Reflection guideline and the workshop outline) include all the things mention on the papers.
• Note: write a subtitles and nuclide the details on the attached file beside every subtitle.
E.g.
Description
Details of the event/development activity
1. What happened
2. What was the experience
3. What was your role
4. What did other people do/What did you do.
5. What was the purpose?

Write paragraphs under each of the following:
Description
Self-analysis
Analysis of learning
Application in context
Evaluation
Reconstruct self-concept
Action

 Write an Introduction 2 paragraphs and conclusion about the document attached no reference is needed. I’ve also attached a rubric make sure you follow it. the question is “Do you think scientific method is a myth?”

Basically the whole essay a research paper on racism on international students

P‌‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍rimary Source Analysis Papers–This semester, you will write a response paper on a primary source. This paper will should be about 2-3 page in length, in which you will analyze a primary source, as well as to argue clearly and convincingly about its role in the historical milieu. Your analysis should use the techniques set out by the class handout, How to Approach Primary Source Extracts. For more detailed information on these assignments, please see the PDF handout Primary Source Essays in the Course Documents section of eCourseware. You may choose from any of the primary source documents found on the course schedule. Please email me if you have any questions. Your analysis should use the techniques set out by the class handout, How to Approach Primary Source Extracts. You should make an argument using one or more of the more sophisticated elements of primary source analysis – Bias, Absence, Reliability, Today, and Relate. You should be making a‌‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍n historical argument though, and state it clearly in a thesis statement. Please remember to analyze the texts using close-reading techniques, noting details, connections, and patterns. Essays should be organized with a clear thesis statement and well-supported with evidence from the texts. I am looking for you to take your analysis beyond what we have discussed on the discussion boards for this class. This means more in-depth critiques and evaluation of the sources, and its role in the larger debate about feudalism. When use secondary scholarly works to help formulate your ideas (such as the articles above), you must cite them within your essay as well as on a Works Cited page. No doing so constitutes academic dishonesty. Citations should follow Chicago Manual of Style footnote or in-text parenthetical methods. If you do not know these methods, this reference work is available online (under the course links portion of the eCourseware homepag‌‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‍e).

(no more and no fewer than 15 pages, excluding the cover page, the abstract, and references; APA Style 6th ed.; 8 or more references). Identify your course-related interests and select a meaningful-to-you, course-relevant topic while taking into account your anticipated application of the course teachings in your professional (theory, research, and practice), creative, and personal life. NOTE: This Scholarly Paper is expository or investigative in nature and incorporates evidence-based literature review and interpretation, as well as literature on best practices. Please utilize peer-reviewed, primary sources of information as much as possible. Reach out to your instructor proactively should you have any questions and/or would like to discuss this paper. . Before writing your Scholarly Paper, please succinctly articulate your topic, key question(s), sub-questions, purpose statement, outline, and resources: (a) CENTRAL QUESTION(S): Define the central question(s) you are going to ask in your paper. Typically, such questions will be open-ended questions that begin with “what,” “when,” “how,” “in which ways,” etc. and focus on the phenomenon you intend to learn more about; (b) SUB-QUESTIONS: Establish sub-question(s) that you are going to pose in your paper. Sub-questions will allow you to unfold and to explore your central question(s) in depth and, thus, to enrich your understanding of the selected phenomenon. Please form sub-questions using the open-ended questions format mentioned above; (c) PURPOSE STATEMENT: Construct your purpose statement based on the central question(s) and sub-questions you established. A clear purpose statement is an essential, invaluable element of your paper that shapes your paper outline and informs your entire paper. The purpose statement states your intent and is placed at the end of your Introduction. It typically begins with, “The purpose of this paper is to 1, 2, 3, and (perhaps) 4.” Please employ higher-order-thinking verbs in your purpose statement: explore, describe, discover, understand, develop, formulate, explain, evaluate, identify, investigate, delineate, articulate, inform, interpret, design, review, systematize, demystify, analyze and synthesize, create, and the like; (d) OUTLINE: Build a sound outline for your research paper, aligning the three key elements articulated above—central question(s), sub-questions, and purpose statement—with the paper outline; and (e) RESOURCES: List key resources you plan to utilize in your paper. Make sure that you incorporate contemporary evidence-based, peer-reviewed, and best practice sources.

Option #2: Personality Differences Have you ever worked with an individual that rubbed you the wrong way? Or have you ever worked for a leader who often only takes the advice of individuals whom he or she is like? Honestly, it is not uncommon for individuals to prefer people who are like them. In fact, you might have heard the phrase, “Birds of a feather flock together.” While we find comfort in those who are like us, organizations and teams cannot operate with individuals who all have the same personalities, thought processes, mindsets, etc. For this critical thinking activity, do the following: Explain why diversity, in terms of personality differences, is important in organizations. Analyze the strengths and weaknesses of three personality instruments. Discuss the benefits and drawbacks of using personality type information when making hiring decisions, forming teams, etc. Explain why you agree or disagree with this statement, “Individual should not make their personality type known to others, as this can lead to manipulation.” Submission Requirements Write a 3- to 4-page paper, not including the title and reference pages, which are required. Your paper must be properly cited and formatted according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA (Links to an external site.).

1) what is known about your chosen Stem Cell therapy or product, and what has been demonstrated in animal models, human cells in vitro and humans in clinical trials (if any) 2) how the therapy would be accomplished a. what materials/cells would you use & why b. what procedures (how would you acquire, prepare, expand, maintain and administer cells) would you use & why c. what preliminary animal & cell & human experiments would you perform & why d. what are some of the possible problems you forsee (such as technical issues, maintenance of SC transplants (If relevant) therapeutic risks, regulatory issues and/or ethical issues, opportunities for commercialization, and just what do you want to know about the ‘donor’ of the SCs….and why?) e. what are some of the possible ancillary products you might be able to commercialize from this project Please provide all references and if you are quoting an author please cite them

Terrorists are increasingly using suicide attacks because of the tactical advantages that they have over conventional attacks. Discuss the six characteristics of suicide terrorism

I need to an essay of 500 words, i need to write about a teacher who made the greatest impact on me as student and as a person. I need to evaluate what the teacher did that made a difference in your life and then describe how the teacher impact in my life